● FULL SPECTRUM INTEGRATED AIR DEFENCE

The governance layer
every weapon system
is missing.

From Group 1 UAS to hypersonic glide vehicles. Phalanx, Dragonfire, NASAMS, Iron Dome. Every system can engage. None of them document who authorised it, what the threat classification was, or who accepted the residual risk. SOVEREIGN SHIELD does.

VIEW LIVE DEMO REQUEST BRIEFING
GROUP 1-3 UAS30s window · RF+EO detect
SHAHED-136180s window · Thermal+Radar
120mm MORTAR60s window · ARTHUR locate
KALIBR CRUISE120s window · NASAMS/IRIS-T
ISKANDER-M SRBM210s window · PAC-3 intercept
KINZHAL HGV6s defeat window · Pre-auth required
GROUP 1-3 UAS30s window · RF+EO detect
SHAHED-136180s window · Thermal+Radar
120mm MORTAR60s window · ARTHUR locate
KALIBR CRUISE120s window · NASAMS/IRIS-T
ISKANDER-M SRBM210s window · PAC-3 intercept
KINZHAL HGV6s defeat window · Pre-auth required
THREAT TAXONOMY
UAS to Hypersonic.
One governance layer.
SOVEREIGN SHIELD handles every air threat class. The engagement window determines the ARoE autonomy tier. The audit trail documents every decision regardless of who — or what — made it.

UAS — Groups 1 to 5

30–180s window · SUPERVISED / COMMANDED · RF, acoustic, radar, EO detect · RF jam, net, laser, CIWS defeat

Indirect Fire — Mortar, Artillery, MLRS

15–60s window · SUPERVISED + fast confirm · ARTHUR weapon locating · C-RAM, Iron Dome, CIWS defeat

Cruise Missile — Subsonic and Supersonic

45–120s window · PRE-APPROVED PROFILE · 3D AESA radar detect · NASAMS, IRIS-T, Phalanx, Dragonfire defeat

Ballistic — SRBM / MRBM

90–210s window · PRE-APPROVED PROFILE · EL/M-2084 / AN/TPY-2 detect · Patriot PAC-3, THAAD defeat

Hypersonic — HGV / ASM

6s defeat window · PRE-AUTHORISED AUTONOMOUS mandatory · Space-based + OTH detect · HEL / PAC-3 limited defeat · Post-hoc audit critical
INTEGRATION ARCHITECTURE
Any sensor. Any defeat system.
One authorisation layer.
SOVEREIGN SHIELD does not replace weapon systems. It sits above them — governing the authorisation chain, fusing the sensor picture, and generating the post-engagement audit trail that no existing system produces.
ARTHUR WLR
Saab
STUB READY
Giraffe AMB
Saab
STUB READY
EL/M-2084 MMR
Elta / IAI
STUB READY
VERA-NG Passive
ERA Czech
STUB READY
Ground Master 400
Thales
STUB READY
OpenSky ADS-B
OpenSky Foundation
LIVE
Phalanx CIWS
Raytheon · ITAR
STUB READY
Dragonfire HEL
MBDA / Leonardo UK
STUB READY
Starstreak HVM
Thales UK
STUB READY
NASAMS
Raytheon · ITAR
STUB READY
IRIS-T SLM
Diehl Defence
STUB READY
Iron Dome
Rafael · ITAR
STUB READY
Patriot PAC-3
Raytheon · ITAR
STUB READY
Skyranger 30
Rheinmetall
STUB READY
Leonidas HPM
Epirus · ITAR
STUB READY
SS COMMAND
MissionOpsAI
LIVE
GOVERNANCE LAYER
The question every engagement
must answer.
⚖

WHO AUTHORISED IT

Pre-approved mission profiles with named command authority. Every engagement maps to a standing order, a legal authority, and an accepting officer. Before the trigger, not after.

◉

WHAT WAS THE CONFIDENCE

Threat classification score, sensor fusion confidence, positive identification standard. Logged immutably at point of decision. Admissible in coroner court and parliamentary inquiry.

⏱

HOW LONG DID IT TAKE

Full OODA cycle time from detection to engagement. Autonomy tier documented per event. The difference between supervised and autonomous engagement is legally significant. SOVEREIGN SHIELD records it.

Capability Sovereignty — Not Data Residency

SOVEREIGN SHIELD runs on Hetzner Helsinki. Outside US Cloud Act jurisdiction. Outside FISA 702. Outside Executive Order 12333. When a US cloud platform receives a lawful demand for data about an engagement, your operational picture goes with it. SOVEREIGN SHIELD is the only IAD governance platform that cannot receive that demand. That matters in Ukraine. It matters in every NATO nation operating US-supplied systems.